Fingolfin wrote:That's the difficulty of adapting a written text into film. What works in one medium doesn't always work in another, that's why changes need to be made.
You probably wouldn't believe how many times people have told me this. While it is true (and really it's fairly self-evident) it doesn't require changing the story - or making it a different kind of story. If PJ or GDT don't like the kind of story The Hobbit is they should adapt something else, or better yet make their own original story.
I want the movie to be very close to the book as well, in terms of overall tone and story, but I also want it to be a good movie
You seem to think these to some degree exclude each other, but I disagree (see below).
The book works well for children because the adventure is up to their imaginations, they get to decide how scary the spiders look or how violent the goblins are.
No, the story works well for children because it's a fun adventure story: dangerous yet overall relatively lighthearted, a developed story yet still easy enough to understand for a young child. Incidentally, that's probably why it appeals to many adults too.
To have the events of The Hobbit toned down to where it is widely accepted as a children's movie betrays the original source material.
The events of The Hobbit don't require toning down to be a children's movie; they would require active darkening to not count as one. You seem to think that all children's movies are goofy and with as much darkness (or maturity) as the average Saturday morning cartoon. This is not the case. A children's movie doesn't have to be camp or immature.